Case ID: 314

Publication date: 20 Dec, 2024

Consensus grade: GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1)

User Diagnosis Difficulty Comment
Pathologist 1 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 2 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 3 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 4 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical

there are some confluent aspects, but 6 is better in my opinion

Pathologist 5 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 6 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 7 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline lower
Pathologist 8 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline higher

Some PIN-like areas

Pathologist 9 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 10 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 11 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 12 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 13 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 14 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 15 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 16 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical

All well formed separate glands, some pseudohyperplastic

Pathologist 17 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 18 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 19 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical

Some pseudohyperplastic areas. Don't think there is enough glandular fusion for pattern 4. Also a few tangentially sectioned glands.

Pathologist 20 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 21 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline higher
Pathologist 22 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 23 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 24 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical


Case description (by case creator):

Typical 336 with only a few glands that may be thought to be somewhat poorly formed. Not enough for GP4.